Libraries are under budget constraints when purchasing
titles for their collection. They have to decide the best way to spend money
while meeting patron demand. Reviews from professional publications assist
librarians in choosing titles. But ebook only books do not have adequate
professional reviews. I think librarians would be less likely to add titles to
the collection when ebooks have not been reviewed by professional reviews. It
comes down to using the public tax money for the greatest quality of literature.
It would be very difficult to grow an ebook collection without reliable professional
reviews. Professional reviews will contain appeal factors, whereas other
reviews may not utilize these factors. Without reviews, it would be difficult
to discern the quality of literature written by unknown authors.
I would say that neither of the reviews for The Billionaire’s First Christmas seems reliable.
We really do not know about the qualifications of these reviewers and even the
blog review didn’t give it great reviews, even saying that the story was kind
of odd. I would not add The Billionaire’s
First Christmas to my library collection based off of these personal
reviews. Besides, it is already free on Amazon, so readers with Kindles could
purchase it that way. If it had some professional reviews, I might then give it
consideration. I would not spend library money on purchasing titles based on reviews
that I did not view as credible, such as those found on Amazon. I would have to
do some checking about the blog reviewer to see about his or her
qualifications, which would also take extra time. It is just faster (and
reliable) to use professional resources for reviews. If an ebook title is not
mentioned in professional reviews, then I would more than likely skip the
purchase when using library funding.
The ebook does not look like romantic suspense. It does not
have any of the appeal factors that make a romantic suspense. Appeal factors
for romantic suspense include: the heroine is in danger in which she has to
save herself; the heroine has to choose between two men; storyline is fast
paced and told from the heroine’s point of view. The Amazon review states that it is told from
the point of view of both of the main characters, Robyn Hurst and Aaron Winters
(the only man involved). The summary does not say anything about Robyn saving
herself, nor is she ever in any danger. Both reviews list it as a romance and
even the cover gives the appearance of a romance book.
The reviews for Angela’s Ashes are vastly different in the
aspect that they are professional with rich detail and information. The reviews
are from credible sources qualified to provide book reviews. It is interesting
as well that all four reviews are comparable to each other. I would have no
problem adding Angela's Ashes to my collection.
Reviews that offer negative content can at times provide a
more trustworthy evaluation. Since we all have different likes/dislikes, I
think that negative comments help readers know what they might be reading and that
they might consider that is not the book for them. Reviews that provide both
positive and negative content allows for a more honest evaluation of the book.
Sometimes one type of book does get reviewed more often and
it is unfair because you can be missing out on a really good book that just is
not receiving any reviews. It affects collection development because libraries
rely so heavily on the reviews that these other great titles are being missed, and
leads to only providing titles that are heavily reviewed in our collections.
While I don’t purchase for my library, typically I will read
Library Journal and occasionally Kirkus reviews. I also use reviews from Goodreads for a lot of
my book selections. I do like to read personal opinions for my own reading and
I like to get opinions from friends and other librarians. That being said, I
still take reviews with a grain of salt, knowing they are based on someone
else’s personal opinion. What one person likes (or dislikes) will be different
from someone else’s viewpoint. If and when I get the opportunity to purchase
for a library, I would rely on professional sources.
Anne, I agree that honest reviews are best. And like you said, you still need to take them with a grain of salt, but having the open interpretation helps to let readers know about potentially offensive, boring, or disappointing characteristics.
ReplyDeletegreat prompt response. Full points!
ReplyDelete